Dreaming the impossible dream: Ordering risks in Australian maternity care policies
School of History, Heritage and Society, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Burwood VIC
PP: 023 - 035
Explaining the trajectory of Australian health policies over the last century requires an analysis of different political regimes and their dreams of order for managing risk. Crook reverses the Beckian axiom that risk is the unintended outcome of the failure of industrial societies, arguing for an understanding of risk within a Foucauldian and Actor Network Theory of governmentality.
Risk becomes a mechanism for the realisation of different dreams of order. The welfare state was the risk management mechanism of organised capitalism. Individual aspirations of reflexive individuals form the risk management mechanism of neo-liberal regimes.
As competing risk discourses destabilise the field of maternity care, key actors (including doctors, midwives, women and policymakers) form themselves into neo-traditional communities in ongoing struggles to have their risk claims institutionalised within policies and protocols that further legitimise their interests. These struggles around risk and power are evident in recent debates over maternity policy in the context of the 2009 Maternity Services Review and the policy aftermath.
maternity; risk; governmentality; sociology; orderings; neo-liberalism
Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council. (2008). Primary maternity services in Australia - A framework for implementation for primary maternity services. Canberra, ACT, Australia: The Maternity Services Interjurisdictional Committee.
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bastian, H., Keirse, M. J., & Lancaster, P. (1998). Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: Population based study. British Medical Journal, 317, 384-388.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
Beck, U. (2009). World risk society. Malden, MA: Polity.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London, England: Sage.
Biro, M., Waldenstrom, U., & Pannifex, J. (2000). Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service. A randomised control trial. Birth, 27(3), 168-174.
Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2007). Performing and reforming leaders, gender, educational restructuring and organizational change. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Brodsky, P. L. (2008). The control of childbirth: Women versus medicine through the ages. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
Colebatch, H. K. (1989). The concept of regulation in the analysis of the organised world. Law and Policy, 11(1), 71-237.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). Improving maternity services in Australia: A discussion paper from the Australian Government. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Crook, S. (1999). Ordering risks. In D. Lupton (Ed), Risk and sociocultural theory (pp. 160-185). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Crook, S., Pakulski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization: Change in advanced society. London, England: Sage.
Dean, M. (1999). Risk, calculable and incalculable. In D. Lupton (Ed), Risk and sociolcultural theory (pp. 131-159). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Department of Health and Ageing. (2009). Improving maternity services in Australia (maternity services review). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Author.
Department of Health, NSW (2008). Primary maternity services in Australia: A framework for implementation, Prepared on behalf of the Maternity Services Inter-jurisdictional Committee, Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Author.
Department of Health, Victoria. (1990). Having a baby in Victoria. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Author.
Department of Human Services and Health. (1995). Australian hospital care study: Preliminary report. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Author.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London, England: Routledge.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Forde, O. H. (1998). Is imposing risk awareness cultural imperialism? Social Science and Medicine, 47(9), 1155-1159.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1984). The history of sexuality. Vol. 1, An introduction (Robert Hurley Trans. from the French). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies, towards a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Guilliland, K., & Pairman, S. (1995). The midwifery partnership: A model for practice. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Victoria University of Wellington.
Heimer, C., Petty, J. C., & Culyba, R. J. (2005). Risk and rules: the 'legalization' of medicine. In B. Hutter & M. Power (Eds.), Organizational encounters with risk (pp. 92-131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodnett, E. D. (2001). Continuity of care givers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2000(2): CD000062.
Homer, C. S. E., Davis, G. K., Brodie, P. M., Sheehan, A., Barclay, L. M., Wills, J., et al. (2001). Collaboration in maternity care: A randomised controlled trial comparing community-based continuity of care with standard care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 108(1), 16-22.
Hutter, B. M. (2005). 'Ways of seeing': Understandings of risk in organizational settings. Organizational encounters with risk (pp. 67-91). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hutter, B. M., & Power, M. (2005). Organizational encounters with risk: An introduction. Organizational encounters with risk (pp 1-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, K., & Davis, B. (2005). Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: Large prospective study in North America. British Medical Journal, 330, 1416-1422.
Lane, K. (1995). The medical model of the body as a site of risk: A case study of childbirth. In J. Gabe (Ed.), Medicine, health and risk: Sociological approaches (sociology of health and illness monograph series). Oxford, England: Blackwells.
Lane, K. (2000). Multiple visions or multiple aversions? Consumer representation, consultation and participation in maternity issues. The Annual Review of Health Social Sciences, 10, 43-52.
Lane, K. (2005). Collaborative care in maternity services. International research in midwifery. New York, NY: Nova.
Lane, K. (2006). The plasticity of professional boundaries. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 341-352.
Lash, S. (2002). Risk culture. In U. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 47-62). London, England: Sage.
Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1994). Economies of signs and space. London, England: Sage.
Leap, N., & Hunter, B. (1993). The midwife's tale: An oral history from handywoman to professional midwife. London, England: Scarlet Press.
Leslie, M. S., & Ramano, A. (2007). Birth can safely take place at home and in birthing centres. Journal of Perinatal Education - Supplement, 16, 81S-88S.
Lofquist, W. S., Cohen, M. A., & Rabe, M. A. (Eds.) (1997). Debating corporate crime. Highland Heights, KY: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Northern Kentucky University.
Lupton, D. (1994). The great debate about cholesterol: Medical controversy and the news media. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 334-339.
Lupton, D. (1999). Introduction: risk and sociocultural theory. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociolcultural theory (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Malpas, J., & Wickham, G. (1995). Governance and failure: The limits of sociology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 37-50.
McCourt, C., & Page, L. (1996). Report on the evaluation of one-to-one midwifery. London, England: The Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust and Thames Valley University.
McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Malden, MA: Polity.
McRobbie, A., & Thornton, S. L. (1995). Rethinking 'moral panic' for multi-mediated social worlds. British Journal of Sociology 46(4), 559-574.
Murphy-Lawless, J. (1998). Reading birth and death - A history of obstetric thinking. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Olsen, O. (1997). Home vs hospital birth. In J. P. Neilson, C. A. Crowther, E. D. Hodnett, & G. F. Hofmeyr (Eds.), Pregnancy and childbirth module of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (issue 1). Oxford, England: Cochrane Library.
Pesce, A. (2009). President AMA (transcripts from Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee, Thursday, December, 17), Canberra, ACT, Australia: AMA.
Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything. London, England: Demos.
Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Reiger, K. (2006). The neoliberal quickstep: Contradictions in Australian maternity care policy. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 330-340.
Rowley, M. J., Hensley, M. J., Brinsmead, M. W., & Wlodarczyk, J. H. (1995). Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: A randomised trial. Medical Journal of Australia, 163(6), 289-193.
Salter, B. (2004). The new politics of medicine. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theory. (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Short, J. (1992). Defining, explaining and managing risks. In J. Short, & L. Clarke, (Eds.), Organizations, uncertainties and risk (pp.3-23). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Skolbekken, J. A. (1995). The risk epidemic in medical journals. Social Science and Medicine, 40(3), 291-305.
Tew, M. (1990). Safer childbirth? A critical history of maternity care. London, England: Chapman and Hall.
Tonkiss, F. (2006). Contemporary economic sociology: Globalisation, production, inequality. London, England: Routledge.
Turner, B. (2008). The body & society: Explorations in social theory. London, England: Sage.
Waldenstrom, U., & Turnbull, D. (1998). A systematic review comparing continuity of midwifery care with standard maternity services. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 105, 1160-1170.
Willis, E. (1989). Medical dominance: The division of labour in Australian health care. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.