Archives
Genes and families in the media: Implications of genetic discourse for constructions of the ‘family’
Shona Crabb
Senior Research Officer, Discipline of Psychiatry - Royal Adelaide Hospital, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide SA
Martha Augoustinos
Department of Psychology, University of Adelaide, SA
Abstract
Many critics have previously examined the ways in which the pervasive construction of the family in Western nations - that of the heterosexual nuclear family - is normalised and naturalised in a range of contexts.
This paper examines discourses of genetics and the 'family' in a series of UK newspaper articles, many of which are non-normative family forms, including families who have used assisted reproductive technologies, and lesbian and gay parented families.
We analyse the ways in which genetic discourse is employed in these articles in relation to complex social and psychological issues regarding identity, psychological adjustment, and appropriate parenting and family structures.
In particular, genetically-unrelated families (or those who use technologies to produce genetically-related offspring) are constructed as problematic and, thus, we argue that dominant genetic discourses function to reproduce, and construct as 'natural', socially-conservative notions of the family, further marginalising non-heteronormative families.
Keywords
genetics, families, reproductive technologies, sociology, discourse, media
References
Augoustinos M and Crabb S (under review) Genomics discourse: Implications for individual, familial and social identity.
Burman E (1997) Developmental psychology and its discontents, in Fox D and Prilleltensky I (eds) Critical Psychology: An Introduction, Sage: London, pp.134-149.
Clarke V (2002) Sameness and difference in research on lesbian parenting, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 6: 210-222.
d'Agincourt-Canning L (2006) A gift or a yoke? Women's and men's responses to genetic risk information from BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, Clinical Genetics 70: 462-472.
Dempsey D (2006) Active fathers, natural families and children's origins: Dominant themes in the Australian political debate over eligibility for assisted reproductive technology, Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 4: 28-44.
Finkler K (2000) Experiencing the New Genetics: Family and Kinship on the Medical Frontier, University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia PA.
Kirkman M (2004) Genetic connection and relationships in narratives of donor-assisted conception, Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 2: 1-20.
Murdock GP (1960) Social Structure, Macmillan: New York.
Potter J (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction, Sage: London.
Riggs DW (2006) Developmentalism and the rhetoric of Best Interests of the Child: Challenging heteronormative constructions of families and parenting in foster care, Journal of GLBT Family Studies 2: 57-73.
Riggs DW (2007) Becoming Parent: Lesbians, Gay Men, and Family, Post Pressed: Teneriffe QLD.
Short E, Riggs DW, Perlesz A, Brown R and Kane G (2008) Australian Psychological Society Literature Review on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Parented Families, APS: Melbourne.
Summerfield T and McHoul A (2005). Family as a commonsensical device and its place in law, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 18: 243-261.
Wetherell M (1998) Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue, Discourse and Society 9: 387-412.
Wetherell M, Taylor S and Yates SJ (eds) (2001) Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, Sage: London.
eContent Home
