Archives
The Impact of Moral Suasion on Internet HIV/AIDS Support Groups
Evidence from a discussion of seropositivity disclosure ethics
David Rier
Abstract
Internet support groups are widely considered friendly, non-judgmental 'safe spaces' for exchanging support and information. However, online HIV/AIDS support group discussions of seropositivity disclosure ethics show that morality is hotly debated, sometimes in very harsh, judgmental terms.
This paper is based on a wider study of over 16,000 pages downloaded from 16 different HIV/AIDS support groups. It presents a single discussion ‘thread' in which group pressure persuades a fellow-participant to retreat (at least verbally) from initial unwillingness to disclose his seropositivity to partners.
This paper demonstrates the impact of group discussions, and their potential as agents of change. The Discussion considers why such examples are rare, and what conditions might produce them. It locates this thread within the tradition of community empowerment, and assesses the suitability of Habermas' concept of the ideal speech situation to understanding online support and discourse. Implications for public health are discussed, as are study limitations.
Keywords
Internet, support group, HIV/AIDS, Habermas, ethics, medical sociology
References
AIDS Alert (2003a) The Internet's role as modern bathhouse is being scrubbed: On-line hookups increasingly popular among MSM. AIDS Alert 18(10):121.
AIDS Alert (2003b) Interventions can ease dangers of cybersex: Counselors educate while in chatrooms. AIDS Alert 18(10):124.
American Civil Liberties Union (2004) State Criminal Statutes on HIV Transmission: 2004 (Lesbian and Gay Rights Project AIDS Project).
American Sociological Association (1999) Code of Ethics [approved June 1997].
Bargh JA, McKenna KYA and Fitzsimons FM (2002) Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the 'true self' on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58:33-48.
Bray SJ (2003) Criminal Prosecutions for HIV Exposure: Overview and Analysis Yale University Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Working Paper 3(1):Fall.
British Sociological Association (2002) Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association (March).
Bromseth JCH (2006) Genre Trouble and the Body that Mattered PhD dissertation. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Broom A (2005) The eMale: Prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. Journal of Sociology 41(1):87-104.
Brown P and Mikkelsen EJ (1990) No Safe Place. Berkeley: California.
CDC (2007) HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2005 Vol 17 [revised edn, June] CDC: Atlanta.
Charmaz K (1991) Good Days, Bad Days. Rutgers: New Brunswick.
Ciccarone DH, Kanouse DE, Collins RL, Miu A, Chen JL, Morton SC and Stall R (2003) Sex without disclosure of positive HIV serostatus in a US probability sample of persons receiving medical care for HIV infection. American Journal of Public Health 93:949-54.
Connery BA (1997) IMHO: Authority and egalitarian rhetoric in the virtual coffeehouse. In D Porter (ed) Internet Culture. Routledge: NY. pp.161-79.
Cummings JN, Sproull L and Kiesler SB (2002) Beyond hearing: Where real-world and online support meet. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6(1):78-88.
Davis M, Hart G, Bolding G, Sherr L and Elford J (2006) E-dating, identity, and HIV prevention: Theorising sexualities, risk and network society. Sociology of Health and Illness 28:457-78.
Esquivel A, Meric-Bernstam F, Bernstam EV (2006) Accuracy and self-correction of information received from an Internet breast cancer list: Analysis of posting content. British Medical Journal 332(22 April):939-42.
Ess C (1996) The political computer: Democracy, CMC and Habermas. In Ess C (ed) Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. SUNY: Albany. pp.197-230.
Ess C and the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (approved 27 November).
Foucault M [1978](1991) Governmentality. In G Burchell, C Gordon and P Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Chicago: Chicago. pp.87-104.
Foucault M. [1980](1991) Questions of method. In G Burchell, C Gordon and P Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Chicago: Chicago. pp.73-86.
Glaser BG and Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine de Gruyter: NY.
Greene K, Derlega VJ, Yep GA and Petronio S (2003) Privacy and Disclosure of HIV in Interpersonal Relationships. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah.
Guadagno R and Cialdini R (2005) Online persuasion and compliance: Social influence on the Internet and beyond. In Y Amichai-Hamburger (ed) The Social Net. Oxford: Oxford. pp.91-113.
Habermas J [1962](1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (trans T Burger) MIT: Cambridge.
Habermas J [1983](1990) Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (trans by C Lenhardt and SW Nicholsen) MIT: Cambridge. pp.43-115.
Hering S (2000) The Internet: A Liberating Medium? The Illness Narratives of Those Affected by AIDS as Shaped and Presented in Virtual Support Groups on the Internet. Master's thesis, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Bar-Ilan University.
Hoffman H (2006) Criticism as deviance and social control in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(6):669-95.
Indyk D and Rier D (1993) Grassroots AIDS knowledge: Implications for the boundaries of science and collective action. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15(1):3-43.
Jacobs A (2006) Battling HIV where sex meets crystal meth. New York Times 21 Feb.
King SA (1996) Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of the results. The Information Society 12(2):119-27.
Klitzman R and Bayer R (2003) Mortal Secrets. Johns Hopkins: Baltimore.
Lawyers' Collective HIV/AIDS Unit (2004) The duty to disclose. Positive Dialogue 17(June):1-4.
Maman S and Medley A (2004) Gender Dimensions of HIV Status Disclosure to Sexual Partners. Department of Gender and Women's Health, WHO: Geneva.
McKnight J [1978](1990) Politicizing health care. In P Conrad and R Kern (eds) The Sociology of Health and Illness (3rd ed) St Martin's Press: NY. pp.432-36.
McPhee J and Stewart C (2005) Recent developments in law. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2(3):122-29.
Ormerod DC and Gunn MJ (1996) Criminal liability for the transmission of HIV. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues (No 1).
Parsons JT, VanOra J, Missildine W, Purcell DW and Gomez CA (2004) Positive and negative consequences of HIV disclosure among seropositive injection drug users. AIDS Education and Prevention 16:459-75.
Petersen A and Lupton D (1996) The New Public. Health Sage: London.
Poster M (1997) Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere. In D Porter (ed) Internet Culture. Routledge: NY. pp.201-17.
Rier DA (forthcoming) Internet social support groups as moral agents: The ethical dynamics of HIV+ status disclosure. Accepted for publication Sociology of Health and Illness.
Robinson KM (2001) Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: A rich source of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research 11:706-14.
Serovich JM, Mason TL, Bautista D and Toviessi P (2006) Gay men's report of regret of HIV disclosure to family, friends, and sex partners. AIDS Education and Prevention 18:132-38.
Sharf A (1997) Communicating breast cancer on line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health 26:65-84.
Strauss A (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge.
Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7:321-26.
Turkle S (1995) Life on the Screen. Simon and Schuster: NY.
UNAIDS and WHO (2006) AIDS Epidemic Update [December] WHO: Geneva.
Wallace P (2001) The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge.
Walstrom MK (2000) 'You know, who's the thinnest?': Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3:761-83.
Walther JB (2002) Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology 4:205-16.
eContent Home