Archives
The Interaction of Gender and Class in Nursing
Appropriating Bourdieu and adding Butler
Kate Huppatz
Department of Social Work and Policy Studies, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to propose a conceptual framework for exploring the ways in which class and gender interact in occupational fields.
In recent years, very little research has been specifically concerned with the relationship between gender and class. Much of the literature which grapples with the question of how gender and class interact contains theoretical limitations which appear to stem from a reliance on categorical theories of both class and gender.
In this paper it is proposed that, when used in conjunction, the approaches of Bourdieu and Butler provide a framework for exploring class and gender in terms of embodied practice. In order to illustrate the possibilities enabled by 'appropriating Bourdieu and adding Butler', the paper suggests ways in which this conceptual framework makes possible the examination of the complex relations between gender and class within one particular area of 'women's work': the field of nursing.
Keywords
sociology, Bourdieu, Butler, gender, class, nursing
References
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2001) Education - Participation in Education: Gender Differences in Higher Education available at: http://www.abs.gov.au.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2005) Australian Social Trends: Nursing Workers available at: http://www.abs.gov.au.
Boughn S (2001) Why women and men choose nursing. Nursing and Health Care Perspective 22(1):14-19.
Bourdieu P (1990) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Bourdieu P (2000) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (translated by Nice R) Routledge: London.
Bourdieu P (2001) Masculine Domination (translated by Nice R) Polity: Cambridge.
Bullock H and Waugh I (2004) Caregiving around the clock: How women in nursing manage career and family demands. Journal of Social Issues 60(4):767-786.
Connell R (1983) Which Way Is Up?: Essays on Sex, Class and Culture. George Allen and Unwin: Sydney.
Egland J and Brown J (1988) Sex role stereotyping and role strain of male registered nurses. Research in Nursing and Health 11:257-267.
Eisenstein Z (1979) Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case For Socialist Feminism. Monthly Review Press: New York.
Gibson-Graham J (1996) The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It). Blackwell: Cambridge.
Greenberg E and Levine B (1971) Role strain in nurses: A preliminary investigation. Nursing Forum X(4):416-430.
Hartmann H (1981) The unhappy marriage of marxism and feminism: towards a more progressive union. In Sargent L (ed) Women and Revolution. Black Rose Books: Montreal: 1-42.
Kemp A (1994) Women's Work: Degraded and Devalued. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
Lovell T (2000) Thinking feminism with and against Bourdieu. Feminist Theory 1:11-32.
Manley J (1995) Sex segregated work in the professions: The development and stratification of nursing. The Sociological Quarterly 36(2):297-314.
McCall L (1992) Does gender fit? Bourdieu, feminism, and the concepts of social order. Theory and Society 21:837-867.
McNay L (1999) Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity. Theory, Culture and Society 16(1):95-117.
McNay L (2000) Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Polity: Cambridge.
Muldoon O (1995) Career aspirations, job satisfaction and gender identity in female student nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21(3):544-550.
Skeggs B (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. Sage: London.
eContent Home