Archives
DNA Paternity Tests
A comparative analysis of the US and Australia
Michael Gilding
Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria
Abstract
There are five times as many DNA paternity tests per capita in the US than Australia. This is not a consequence of 'technological lag', but a combination of political, cultural and economic factors.
First, government agencies in the US enforce relatively more tests, at least partly because of legislative differences in the presumption of paternity. Second, government agencies in the US enforce relatively more tests partly on account of differences in family structure. More specifically, in the US there are relatively more nonmarital births, and nonmarital births are less likely to occur in the context of informal cohabitation where paternity is not in dispute. Third, differences in industry organisation account for more DNA paternity tests per capita in the US.
Unlike the Australian market, the US market is characteristically divided between tests done for government agencies and those for private individuals. In turn, the private market in the US is more competitive. In particular, brokerage is pervasive, leading to more proactive marketing through the Internet, day-time television and other avenues. The study highlights the importance of social dynamics in the uptake of new technologies.
Keywords
genetic testing, comparative sociology, paternity testing, sociology of family, sociology of science and technology
References
Agar N (2004) Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. Blackwell: Malden MS.
American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) (1992-2004) Annual Report Summary for Testing 1991-2003 AABB (typescripts): Bethesada MD.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2003) Births 2003. Catalogue No. 3301.0.
ALRC/NHMRC (Australian Law Reform Commission/National Health and Medical Research Council) (2002) Protection of Human Genetic Information: Discussion Paper 66 AGPS: Canberra.
Australian Government (2004) Proving Parentage For The Purposes Of A Child Support Assessment. Attorney-General's Department: Canberra. http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/WWW/familylawHome.nsf. Last modified 19/3/2004, accessed 26/9/2005.
Bauer MW and Gaskell G (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Borém A, Santos F and Bowen D (2003) Understanding Biotechnology. Prentice Hall: Upper Sadler River.
Coltrane S and Collins R (2001) Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love, and Property, 5th edition. Wadsworth: Belmont.
Curran L and Abrams L (2000) Making men into dads: fatherhood, the state and welfare reform. Gender and Society 14(5):662-677.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1995) Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childrearing. US Department of Public Health: Hyattsville MA.
De Vaus D (2004) Diversity And Change In Australian Families: Statistical Profiles. Australian Institute of Family Studies: Melbourne.
De Vaus D (2005) Ex-nuptial children in Australia: An empirical analysis of nonmarital births. Journal of Family Studies 11(1):36-45.
De Vaus D and Wolcott I (1997) Australian Family Profiles: Social and Demographic Patterns. Australian Institute of Family Studies: Melbourne.
Esping-Andersen G (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Polity: Cambridge.
Friedman A (1999) Forensic DNA profiling in the 21st century. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 43(2):168-79.
Fukuyama F (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux: New York.
Gilding M (2004) DNA paternity testing without the knowledge or consent of the mother. Family Matters 68:68-75.
Haney L and March, M (2003) Married fathers and caring daddies: welfare reform and the discursive politics of paternity. Social Problems 50(4):461-481.
Hindmarsh R and Lawrence G (2004) Recoding Nature: Critical Perspectives On Genetic Engineering. University of New South Wales Press: Sydney.
Khoo S and McDonald P (1988) Ex-nuptial births and unmarried cohabitation in Australia. Journal of the Australian Population Association 5(2):164-77.
Mackenzie D and Wajcman J (1999) Introductory essay: the social shaping of technology. In D Mackenzie and J Wajcman (eds) The Social Shaping of Technology. Open University Press: Buckingham: 3-27.
McLanahan S and Sandefur G (1994) Growing Up With A Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MS.
National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2002) Uniform Parentage Act http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/upa/final2002.htm. Accessed 26/9/2005.
North Carolina Dept of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) (No Date) Child Support Enforcement Manual http://info.dhhs.state.nc.us/olm/manuals/dss/cse/man/index.htm. Accessed 2/8/05
Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) (2005) Handbook on Child Support Enforcement http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/pubs/2005/handbook_on_cse.pdf Accessed 14/8/05.
Pilnick A (2002) Genetics And Society: An Introduction. Open University Press: Buckingham.
Silvey J and Birrell B (2004) Financial outcomes for parents after separation. People and Place 12(1):46-57.
Stanley A (2002) So, who's your daddy? In DNA tests TV finds elixir to raise ratings. The New York Times March 12:1.
Sutton PD and Mathews TJ (2004) Trends in characteristics of birth by State: United States, 1990, 1995, and 2000-2002. National Vital Statistics Reports 52(19) National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville MA.
Torgersen H, Hampel J, Von Bergmann-Winberg M, Bridgman E, Durant J, Einsiedel E, Fjaestad B, Gaskell G, Grabner P, Hieber P, Jelsoe E, Lassen J, Marouda-Chatjoulis A, Nielsen TH, Rusanen T, Sakellaris G, Seifert F, Smink C, Twardowski T and Kamara MW (2002) Promise, problems and proxies: twenty-five years of debate and regulation in Europe. In MW Bauer and G Gaskell (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge: 21-94.
Ventura SJ and Bachrach CA (2000) Nonmarital childbearing in the United States, 1940-99. National Vital Statistics Reports 48(16) National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville MA.
Weston R, Staunton D, Qu L and Gray M (2001) Australian families in transition. Family Matters 60:12-23.
Willis E (1998) The new genetics and the sociology of medical technology. Journal of Sociology 34(2):170-183.
eContent Home