Reconstructing the self: Breast cancer and the post-surgical body
Samantha Crompvoets
Rural Clinical School, Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra ACT
PP: 137 - 145
Abstract
In this paper I examine the impact of breast reconstruction on the current status of the mastectomised body. For women who have had a breast amputated, the option of breast reconstruction offers a sense of hope of regaining lost femininity, sexuality and normalcy.
This article reveals that there is no discursive space available for women to reconceptualise their bodies as normal or feminine without breasts. Instead, the post-surgical body is situated as transient, to be 'fixed' as soon as possible. A case study of one woman's failed bilateral reconstruction explores the construction of choice and its implications for the post-surgical body. This study demonstrates that while the expectation of regaining two-breasts prevails, mastectomised women may be unable to renegotiate a 'complete' body without them.
Keywords
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; choice; femininity; identity; mastectomy; normality
References
Broom D (2001) Reading breast cancer: Reflections on a dangerous intersection, Health 5(2): 249-268.
Burcham J (1997) Breast reconstruction: A review of the research and patient and professional resources. NSW: NHMRC National Breast Cancer Centre: 110.
Crouch M and McKenzie H (2000) Social realities of loss and suffering following mastectomy, Health 4(2): 196-215.
Davis K (1994) Reshaping the female body: The dilemmas of cosmetic surgery, London: Routledge.
Doyal L (1990) The plitics of women and surgery: Keynote address, Women and Surgery conference, Melbourne: Healthsharing Women.
Ferguson SJ (2000) Deformities and diseased: The medicalisation of women's breasts, in AS Kasper and Susan J Ferguson (eds) Breast cancer: Society shapes an epidemic, New York: St Martin's Press: 51-86.
Franchelli S, Stella LM, Berrino P, Passarelli B, Capelli M, Baracco G, Alberisio A, Morasso G and Luigi SP (1995) Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using two different methods: Autologous tissues versus prostheses, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 95(7): 1213-1220.
Frank AW (1998) Stories of illness as care of the self: A Foucauldian dialogue, Health 2(3): 329-348.
Gagné P and McGaughey D (2002) Designing women: Cultural hegemony and the exercise of power among women who have undergone elective mammoplasty, Gender and Society 16(6): 814-838.
Giddens A (1990) The consequences of modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Glanz K and Lerman C (1991) Psychosocial impact of breast cancer: A critical review, Annals of Behavioural Medicine 14: 204-212.
Hallowell N (2000) Reconstructing the body or reconstructing the woman? Problems of prophylactic mastectomy for hereditary breast cancer risk, in LK Potts (ed) Ideologies of breast cancer: Feminist perspectives, London: Macmillan Press: 153-180.
Handel N, Silverstein M, Waisman E and Waisman J (1990) Reasons why mastectomy patients do not have breast reconstruction, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 86(6): 1118-1122.
Jacobson N (2000) Cleavage: Technology, controversy, and the ironies of the man-made breast, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Kasper AS (1995) The social construction of breast loss and reconstruction, Women's Health: Research on Gender, Behaviour and Policy 1(3): 197-219.
Leopold E (1999) A darker ribbon: Breast cancer, women, and their doctors in the twentieth century, Boston: Beacon Press.
Lerner B (2000) Inventing a curable disease: Historical perspectives on breast cancer, in Anne S Ferguson and Susan J Kasper (eds) Breast cancer: Society shapes an epidemic, New York: St Martin's Press: 25-50.
Lorde A (1980) The cancer journals, in The Audre Lorde compendium: Essays, speeches and journals (1996), London: Pandora: 1-64.
Lowrey P (1990) Breast augmentation, Women and Surgery Conference, Melbourne: HealthSharing Women.
Lupton D (1994) Femininity, responsibility, and the technological imperative: Discourses on breast cancer in the Australian press, International Journal of Health Services 24(1): 73-89.
Manderson L (1999) Gender, normality and the post-surgical body, Anthropology and Medicine 6(3): 381-394.
Meyerowitz BE (1980) Psychosocial correlates of breast cancer and its treatments, Psychological Bulletin 87: 108-131.
Mock V (1993) Body image in women treated for breast cancer, Nursing Research 42(30): 153-157.
Parker LS (1995) Beauty and breast implantation: How candidate selection affects autonomy and informed consent, Hypatia 10(1): 183-201.
Pauly MK (1991) Women and the knife: Cosmetic surgery and the colonisation of women's bodies, Hypatia 6(3): 25-53.
Pennington D (1999) Reconstructions: Expert opinions, in Barbara Joss (ed) My left breast: How breast cancer transformed my life, Sydney: Joss & Co.: 127-134.
Pierce PF (1993) Deciding on breast cancer treatment: A description of decision-making behaviour, Nursing Research 42(22): 22-28.
Price B (1992) Living with altered body image: The cancer experience, British Journal of Nursing 1(3): 641-645.
Reaby LL (1998) Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 101(7): 1810-1818.
Reaby L, Hort LK and Vandervord J (1994) Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy, Health Care for Women International 15: 361-375.
Riessman CK (1992) Women and medicalisation: A new perspective, in P Brown (ed) Perspectives in medical sociology 1st edn, Prospect Heights Ill: Waveland Press: 190-220.
Rowland J, Dioso J, Holland J, Chaglassian T and Kinne D (1995) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Who seeks it, who refuses? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 95(5): 812-822.
Saywell C, Henderson L and Beattie L (2000) Sexualised Illness: The newsworthy body in media representations of breast cancer, in LK Potts (ed) Ideologies of breast cancer: Feminist perspectives, London, Macmillan Press: 37-62.
Scanlon EF (1991) The role of reconstruction in breast cancer, Cancer 68(5): 1144-1147.
Scully D ([1980] 1994) Men who control women's health: The mis-education of obstetrician-gynaecologists, New York: Teacher's College Press.
Schain W, Wellisch D, Pasnau R and Landsverk J (1985) 'The sooner the better': A study of psychological factors in undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction, American Journal of Psychiatry 142(40): 40-46.
Shanner L (1990) Ethical concerns regarding cosmetic enhancement, Women and Surgery Conference, Melbourne: HealthSharing Women.
The Australian Society of Plastic Surgeons (2002) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy, [Online] Available from http://www.plasticsurgery.org.au (accessed 10 June 2003).
Wainstock JM (1991) Breast cancer: Psychosocial consequences for the patient, Seminars in Oncology Nursing 7: 207-215.
Wickman M (1995) Breast reconstruction: Past achievements, current status and future goals, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Hand Surgery 29: 81-100.
Wijsbek H (2000) The pursuit of beauty: The enforcement of aesthetics or a freely adopted lifestyle? Journal of Medical Ethics 26(6): 454-458.
Williams SJ (1997) Modern medicine and the 'uncertain body': From corporeality to hyperreality? Social Science and Medicine 45(7): 1041-1049.
Yalom M (1997) A History of the Breast, New York: Harper Collins.
Young IM (1990) Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
eContent Home
